A Bayet-Goll; R Moussavi-Harami; A Mahboubi
Abstract
Carbonate deposits of members 1 to 2 of the Mila Group (Middle Cambrian) in Central Alborz that call the Deh-Sufiyan Formation in this research, were studied in Shahmirzad, Tueh-Darvar, Mila-Kuh and Deh-Molla sections. The Unit 2 of Deh-Sufiyan Formatrion in Central Alborz of Northern Iran consists mainly ...
Read More
Carbonate deposits of members 1 to 2 of the Mila Group (Middle Cambrian) in Central Alborz that call the Deh-Sufiyan Formation in this research, were studied in Shahmirzad, Tueh-Darvar, Mila-Kuh and Deh-Molla sections. The Unit 2 of Deh-Sufiyan Formatrion in Central Alborz of Northern Iran consists mainly of shallow marine carbonates and contains a variety of limestone conglomerates. Limestone conglomerate is an important component of Unit 2 of Deh-Sufiyan Formatrion, but its origins remain enigmatic. These limestone conglomerates have a diverse set of characteristics that range from clast to matrix supported with scattered flat pebbles. These conglomerates are largely comprised of oligomictic, rounded lime–mudstone clasts of various sizes and shape (equant, oval, discoidal, tabular, and irregular). According to composition and characteristic sedimentary structures and fabric, limestone conglomerates in the Unit 2 of Deh-Sufiyan Formatrion consist of: (1) Intraformational limestone conglomerate beds were formed by depositional processes (2) Limestone pseudoconglomerate beds were produced by diagenetic processes. The common characteristics of the Unit 2 of Deh-Sufiyan Formatrion pseudoconglomerates, such as oligomictic lithology of lime–mudstone clasts, mosaic fabric, disorganized/edgewise fabric, variable and gradational fabric, transitions from adjacent or underlying facies and the complete lack of depositional structures, are typical of pseudoconglomerates formed by early diagenetic sediment deformation under shallow burial conditions. These characteristics are different from those of intraformational limestone conglomerate showing primary depositional features such as normal or inverse grading, internal stratification, (hummocky) cross-stratification and sharp erosional bases. Diagenetic conglomerates in ribbon rocks resulted from soft-sediment deformation of ribbon rocks during early diagenesis. In contrast, the dimension and thickness, sizes of the clasts, clast-rich beds, size ingredient of matrix, tendency to amalgamate with amalgamation scours within depositional conglomerates suggest that high energy and strong erosion above storm wave base was responsible for the disintegration of the carbonate material.
R. Moussavi-Harami; A. Mahboubi; A. Kheradmand; H. Zandmoghadam
Abstract
For interpretation of paragenetic sequence and post depositional history of siliciclastic sediments of Dahu Formation (Late Camberian), two stratigraphy sections were measured at Dahuieh (type section) and Gazuieh in the NE and E of Zarand, with the thickness of 240 and 227 meters, respectively. The ...
Read More
For interpretation of paragenetic sequence and post depositional history of siliciclastic sediments of Dahu Formation (Late Camberian), two stratigraphy sections were measured at Dahuieh (type section) and Gazuieh in the NE and E of Zarand, with the thickness of 240 and 227 meters, respectively. The diagenetic processes affected these sediments, during three stages eogenesis, mesogenesis and telogenesis, including compaction, cementation, alteration, dissolution, fracturing and vein filling. Clay mineral study within sandstone and mud rocks of Dahu Formation led to identification of two groups of clay as illite and cholerite. Illite form 90% of clay minerals in these sediments that are mostly formed during burials and clay mineral diagenesis as well as alteration and dissolution of potassium feldspar. The interpreted paragenetic sequence shows that a large number of diagenetic processes act in the mesogenetic stage. Physical compaction and hematite cement have operated in eogenetic stage, while other processes such as chemical compaction, silica and dolomite cement, feldspar alteration, sericitization, ilitization and chloritization, dissolution of feldspars and cherts have occurred in mesogenetic stage. The fractures and calcite vein filling have formed in telogenetic stage during uplifting. We hope that this information can be used for evaluation of post depositional and burial history of similar sediments in local and regional scale.
